Looking for a more holistic alternative to Najar?
Corma and Najar (formerly Welii) are both platforms in the field of SaaS management, each offering unique strengths tailored to different organizational needs. Najar, primarily a procurement tool, excels in managing software subscriptions, expenses, and renewals, providing a centralized hub for all procurement activities. This platform is ideal for organizations looking to optimize their spending, ensure compliance with procurement policies, and automate the procurement workflow. On the other hand, Corma stands out in identity access management (IAM), offering a unified platform that streamlines the administration of software licenses and access. Corma's focus on IAM enhances productivity and security, making it a robust solution for organizations seeking to manage software licenses efficiently while adhering to regulatory requirements.
Discover how these platforms compare and which might best suit your organization's needs for effective SaaS governance.
Najar, formerly known as Welii, is primarily a procurement tool designed to streamline the purchasing process within organizations. Najar offers a platform that streamlines SaaS purchasing for Finance and IT teams. It centralizes SaaS purchases through approval workflows, qualitative benchmarks, and briefings. The goal is to help employees make better purchasing decisions and manage their needs.
Scope
Big mid-size and large enterprises
Founded
2021 in Paris
In IT governance around managing software, Corma and Najar (formerly Welii) emerge as two prominent solutions, each catering to distinct organizational needs. Corma excels in identity access management (IAM), offering a unified platform that streamlines the administration of software licenses and access, thereby enhancing productivity and security. Its robust compliance features ensure that organizations adhere to regulatory requirements, including GDPR, while maintaining a secure digital environment. In contrast, Najar, primarily a procurement tool, provides a comprehensive SaaS management platform designed to centralize and manage all SaaS subscriptions efficiently. Known for its user-friendly interface and strong compliance features, Najar ensures visibility into software usage, expenses, and renewals, making it ideal for optimizing SaaS management processes.
While you might say we are biased, this comparison has the goal to show the unique strengths of Corma and Najar, helping organizations identify which platform best aligns with their SaaS management goals and operational needs. Actually, both tools can be used at the same time as there is a degree of complementarity between both. Corma's strength in IAM and SaaS license management can be complemented by Najar's procurement capabilities, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations looking to manage both access and spending efficiently.
Managing expenses around software
Provides real-time visibility into SaaS spending but may require additional integrations for comprehensive cost management.
Offers efficient cost management by simplifying software license administration and reducing unnecessary expenses
Identity Access Management
Focus on SaaS management and procurement, with less no emphasis on IAM
Excels in managing software licenses and access, providing a unified platform for streamlined IAM
For ISO 27001, SOC 2 and other certifications
Ensures compliance with procurement policies and provides tools to manage software subscriptions securely
Ensures robust compliance and security by streamlining access to necessary applications and maintaining control over application usage
(Re-)negotiating software contracts
Providing account manager that negotiate contracts for the client.
Corma allows central contract management around all SaaS apps, but offers no procurement negotations as a service.
Automating workflows around licence management
Automates the discovery, spend optimization, operations, and compliance of SaaS applications
Automates provisioning and request processes, reducing manual effort and improving efficiency
Adaptability for organisations with up to a few hundred users
Tailored for larger enterprises. Can be costly and very complex for smaller organizations
Delivers a cost-effective solution tailored for SMBs
Corma and Najar, both offering features around SaaS management, offer distinct features and advantages tailored to different organizational needs. This is especially visibile when it comes to Identity Access Management where Corma has a wider set of features than Najar, while at the same time Najar is strong on procurement and cost management. Here are the key differences between the two:
1. Identity Access Management (IAM):
Corma excels in managing software licenses and access, providing a unified platform that simplifies IAM processes. This focus on IAM helps organizations streamline access to necessary applications, enhancing productivity and security. Corma's strength in this area makes it a more efficient alternative for automatically provisioning software licenses compared to platforms like Najar.
2. Cost Management and Optimization:
Corma addresses core needs such as cost management and productivity enhancement in SaaS environments. By simplifying software license administration, Corma helps organizations reduce unnecessary expenses and optimize their SaaS spending. This comprehensive approach to cost management sets Corma apart from Najar, which focuses more on procurement by re-negotiating the largest software contracts of the vendor.
3. Compliance and Security:
Corma ensures robust compliance and security by maintaining control over application usage and data security through automated access reviews. This focus on compliance helps organizations adhere to regulatory requirements while providing a secure digital working environment. Corma's emphasis on compliance and security makes it a reliable choice for organizations looking to enhance their SaaS governance.
4. User Experience and Engagement:
Corma enhances user experience by removing barriers to accessing essential tools, leading to higher job satisfaction and engagement. By streamlining access request processes, Corma reduces manual effort and improves efficiency, contributing to a more productive work environment. This user-centric approach differentiates Corma from Najar, which also aims to improve user experience but may not offer the same level of customization for access requests.
These differences highlight Corma's strengths in managing identity access, optimizing costs, ensuring compliance, and enhancing user experience within SaaS environments. Organizations seeking a comprehensive solution for SaaS management and governance may find Corma to be a more efficient and effective choice compared to Najar.
%20(1).png)
